Forum:Removing EZsig

Here I quote:

The user and talk space edits are getting crazy, should we bring in a policy against them? There needs to be a ruleset over what should and should not be done. First, the complex userpages and sigs need to stop. Can I delete the ez sig templates? Actually, I suppose that I should start a forum on this... what are your thoughts? Ajraddatz Talk 05:11, December 10, 2009 (UTC)
 * I am all for anything that gets people editing articles instead of using the site for nothing but social networking. Having said that, if we delete those templates a lot of signatures would be broken all over the site.   16:24, December 10, 2009 (UTC)
 * My bot could do it, and also, does it matter? Anyone who is active would fix their sigs right away anyways. Ajraddatz Talk 19:56, December 10, 2009 (UTC)
 * Ya, but I can already foresee all the messages about 'my signature is broken', 'someone broke my signature, punish them', and 'could you fix my signature'  20:03, December 10, 2009 (UTC)
 * Sitenotice could help that. Just post a message that they've got a week or so before EZSig goes out of style. Didn't I already bring this topic up at Articles for Scrap? 20:57, December 10, 2009 (UTC)

Continue your discussion. Should we remove the EZsig template...or not? And if we do, should I use a different sig? I regret inventing the now-popular rounded-corners signature.

What I want to hear here is not "dont remove it i wanna keep my sig it look so cool!!!!", but thoughtful arguments on whether it would benefit the wiki to get our minds out of the sig world. 21:36, December 10, 2009 (UTC)