My Lego Network Wiki:Articles for Scrap

AfS Archives &gt;

 Articles for Scrap

Example
Follow this example when nominating:

==Name of Article==

Scrap it

 * Signature of voter and optional comment

Keep it

 * Signature of voter

Comments

 * Optional additional comment(s)

Admin results
No decision yet.

Scrap it
my fault for creating it, not needed delete it-- 01:04, December 30, 2009 (UTC)
 * We don't need pages for loops. They don't have an image and what you could say about them is so short it just isn't worth it. At most a loop might have some lyrics or be from a famous piece of music which can be stated on the main Loop page. 03:50, December 22, 2009 (UTC)
 * Agreed.
 * Ditto. [[File:Jas765small.png]] (Page \ Talk / Contributions) 05:04, December 22, 2009 (UTC)

Keep it
UPDATE we now have loop pages so it stays-- 16:00, February 27, 2010 (UTC)Kjhf just said that a few weeks ago Mln vs clubpages 11:59, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

Admin results
Deleted. 3 delete votes plus the author says it is not needed. Zero keep it votes. 18:54, January 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * Rebuilt. Please see the Forums and vote. 13:40, February 14, 2010 (UTC)

Scrap it
do we really need this? we can't do the lego ids terms of service because we don't know if they have a dupe acount. even if it was gone it will be pointless

Comments
This is a wiki about MLN anyway. Discussing the removal on the articles talk page-- 22:35, March 19, 2010 (UTC)

Admin results
Keep it.

Scrap it

 * I am debating whether this article is really needed. I mean, it's the main page and all that, but it has nothing to do with MLN and is pretty pointless. 03:33, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Please give me some useful purpose of a main page on a wiki, send me 1,000,000 Apples and then I might vote to keep it. Honestly, who made this anyways? Ajraddatz Talk 04:15, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ageed Followed by 100 zeroes
 * Seriously?? Who created this? There isn't a single MLN related thing! 11:01, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't understand why it's under protest. 14:28, April 1, 2010 (UTC)

Keep it
Why would you erase it? And besides, IT'S YOUR HOME PAGE, IT'S SUPPOSED TO BE ABOUT THE WIKI, NOT MLN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Charlielegoguy (talk) 19:50, April 1, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah... 00:32, April 2, 2010 (UTC)

Comments
Why is this even being debated? I'm tempted to just go ahead and chuck it without waiting for everyone to vote. 19:52, April 1, 2010 (UTC)

I prefer what they did on brickipedia: they changed it to MegaBloks wiki for the day. 00:32, April 2, 2010 (UTC)

Admin results
Deleted.

Scrap it

 * Does we really need it.I think we don't need it-- 14:32, April 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * Just a list of the games mostly, and all the other information can be found on the pages for each arcade 16:07, April 2, 2010 (UTC)

Keep it

 * I think we should keep it don't forget we have a article called Rough Gems so if this gets scraped then that should too
 * yes we also have Shield, think of that page as a category page-- 16:00, April 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * What exactly is the point of Shield and Rough Gems? They are just lists of items.
 * yes but those are not up for scrap either so this needs to be kept
 * and they are just good for categorization-- 16:16, April 2, 2010 (UTC)
 * Mege to cateogry: acrade,sheid and rough gems?
 * But if they are just for categorizaion, why not delete the page and just use the categories? That is what they were created for after all
 * Ok delete the pages and make the catorgorys everyone agee?
 * i'm agree-- 16:28, April 2, 2010 (UTC)

Comments
In the case we keep it i go to remodel it-- 14:32, April 2, 2010 (UTC)

Admin results
Keep It.

Scrap it

 * i don't think this is needed nothing really has a disambig and there are not two tites the same also i don't think there will be a same item module or masterpeace that would have the same name

Keep it

 * I think a few pages have similar names, such as some of the Sticker pages have nearly the same name as that of a networker I think 17:29, April 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * It is still used. Ajraddatz Talk 16:56, April 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah keep it then if its still used 18:07, April 6, 2010 (UTC)

Admin results
Keep it.

Scrap it

 * It's a pointless hub page, and all of the information can be found on the pages for the individual Gems. Also, this page was previously voted to be deleted, but was undeleted a few months later. 17:36, April 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * ageed as with Shield 18:07, April 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * Both the above and below have a point. Certainly, it's a hub page, and it's not really pointless, and it may even be useful. But its only purpose is as a hub page, obviously, and there's really not enough children of this hub page for it to make sense. 00:23, April 14, 2010 (UTC)

Keep it

 * I dunno why it needs to be removed... Ajraddatz Talk 17:52, April 5, 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree. why remove it. You need a good reason to remove something, right?ZER0-0 see my store 20:22, April 6, 2010 (UTC)
 * Its a pointless hub page not all items need a hub also all of the info is on here here and here 09:34, April 7, 2010 (UTC)
 * It is just like Shield I say we keep it-- 03:44, April 13, 2010 (UTC)

Comments
This will include the new page I'm going to make: Totemic Animal. We have the work on a lot of pages, we also have Shield!-- 22:59, May 14, 2010 (UTC)

Admin results
No decision yet.

File:Cheatcode-2.png
OK, lets have an official discussion on whether or not to include the backgrounds in the networker images.

Scrap it

 * The background is very boring. The original background should be kept.  Also the image is offcenter.  23:16, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Correct, indeed. 23:30, May 25, 2010 (UTC)

Keep it

 * I made it so see what it looked like on the wiki. You can see my argument on the forum but I say that this make users look at the networker not some background that is part of a module, even  has to agree with that!-- 23:18, May 25, 2010 (UTC)

Comments

 * We don't need to delete this one, we can always upload a better version of this file. 23:30, May 25, 2010 (UTC)
 * Good idea. I have uploaded a new image with the colored background. 05:45, May 30, 2010 (UTC)

Please see this. It is what it would look, I like Manny Arms Networker pic mod but this is just to give you an idea. I uploaded the gray one from a cropped on so you can just undo it after a decision is made-- 14:53, May 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * My computer can't save images right now [yet for some reason I could save that image(weird) ] but dude cheatcode is px'ized and looks a lot worse than a default networker so if I could make on like that you might have a change in opinion-- 22:51, May 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * Well I suppose we could just make white/gray bgs for networkers with a hard-to-see bg so that we can see the networker better. For networkers that we can see fine with the bg of origin, then we could just leave it be. 23:01, May 26, 2010 (UTC)
 * But then it would look weird because half would have white and half would have colored... ...I would rather have them all normal -without white bgs, then to have that! Also This is cheatcode!!! he is pxed! let me do it on a normal networker-- 14:41, May 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * I already did it with Commander Hobolt. It's not uploaded, but it looks weird. 16:37, May 30, 2010 (UTC)
 * So I still say we leave all the bgs as the original bgs. Makes the articles more interesting to look at instead of just text, text, and more text. 16:37, May 30, 2010 (UTC)

Admin results
Deleted as it has been superseded by File:Cheatcode-cropped.png  18:10, June 5, 2010 (UTC)

File:Galactic_background.jpg
Why is this up for deletion?? 23:39, May 30, 2010 (UTC)

Comments
This background is missing from the list of backgrounds. Is it a real background? Is there a newer version? 16:54, May 31, 2010 (UTC) Please put it in the list of backgrounds. I thought FB100Z got a new one from the XML so I deleted the old one so please restore-- 17:06, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

This one is not deleted. If you want to keep it, remove the delete tag and it's all yours. 22:45, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

Admin results
No decision yet.