Just a question, is it best with networker pics, showing the whole Networker Pic Module or only with the Networker?
- The template is setup to automatically scale the image to about 220px wide. However this does shrink the full width image a lot. I think a well chosen cropping of the image works better, something closer to 2/3 of the image. Check out Echos page to see what I am talking about. For example, PAL's image in this article could be cropped on both ends. NitecrewRank 3TalkContribs 16:17, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, I'd say don't use the module image. 
(Page \ Talk / Contributions) 11:35, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- OK, is it OK if I start to scale the pics? --Mwarvik3838 13:15, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- If you mean taking new snapshots that are about 2/3rds of the Networker Pic Module than I say go for it. I did Echo's page and no one has said anything, I don't think they noticed. I would just ask everyone take a few moments and figure out what the best 2/3rds of the Pic is. In Echo's case it was the left 2/3rds. In PAL's case it is probably the middle 2/3rds. NitecrewRank 3TalkContribs 17:32, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
the modules can make image bigger you can take a pic to module and cut all except the networker and you have only the networker-- 13:47, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
- We can take more than 'just the networker', some of the background image is also nice. If we wanted just the networker we should snapshot their picture in the left hand nav where our mini-figs can also be found, I don't think that is the way to go. NitecrewRank 3TalkContribs 17:32, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
This page[]
This page appears to be broken... BobaFett TalkBlog Visit Thornax and Goods! Contest! 00:17, January 31, 2010 (UTC)
- What do you mean by "broken"? It seems normal to me.Mackmoron11talkcontribs
The page is split into two halves. BobaFett TalkBlog Visit Thornax and Goods! Contest! 03:45, January 31, 2010 (UTC)
- The coding that Joeman applied does that. I personally don't actually like this new layout - any other people agree/disagree?
Kjhf (Talkative?) Contribs 11:42, January 31, 2010 (UTC)
- Yea, I just looked it over, the tables make it VERY hard to read, and at first I didnt even notice that there were sections for ranks 7-10 aand the mini ranks because they were on the other side.Mackmoron11talkcontribs
- Same here, that's what I meant by broken. Well, its annoying and are secret networkers seymour brickstein, dr.inferno, bob skull and malum supposed to show up? BobaFett TalkBlog Visit Thornax and Goods! Contest! 13:19, January 31, 2010 (UTC)
- Nope, secret Networkers are supposed to have the {{Hideme}} template.Mackmoron11talkcontribs
- Yea, I just looked it over, the tables make it VERY hard to read, and at first I didnt even notice that there were sections for ranks 7-10 aand the mini ranks because they were on the other side.Mackmoron11talkcontribs
- The coding that Joeman applied does that. I personally don't actually like this new layout - any other people agree/disagree?
OK I will fix that. BobaFett TalkBlog Visit Thornax and Goods! Contest! 13:42, January 31, 2010 (UTC)
Bionicle networkers[]
Is wheneua a bionicle mini rank networked, because he has nothing to do with the mini rank, except he is a bionicle.
ZER0-0 13:35, August 18, 2010 (UTC)